NY Assemblymember Alex Bores · 2026
A federal policy proposal from the New York Assemblymember who authored the RAISE Act, now pitching a contingency-based direct payment program designed to activate automatically if AI meaningfully displaces American workers. The AI Dividend is explicitly framed as 'fire insurance' — not a prediction that mass unemployment will occur, but preparation in case it does. The proposal is notable for three novel funding mechanisms: a token tax on AI computation, federal equity warrants in frontier AI companies (out-of-the-money, exercisable only if companies multiply dramatically in value), and tax reform eliminating the accelerated depreciation subsidy for AI capital that currently makes automation cheaper than hiring. Revenue flows to three buckets: direct payments to Americans, workforce transition and education investment, and public AI safety/oversight infrastructure. Bores frames the timing urgency around a closing political window — demanding equity stakes in AI companies after they have already captured the value is far harder than structuring it now.
Contingency-based economic insurance with automatic triggers. Bores explicitly avoids both the accelerationist claim that AI will only create jobs and the doomer claim that mass unemployment is certain. Instead, the framing is risk management: if there is even a meaningful probability of large-scale displacement, responsible governance requires preparation now while the political window is open and AI companies are still in early growth. The philosophy is closer to options pricing than traditional regulation — the equity warrants pay off precisely in the scenario where the dividend is most needed. Notable for treating the tax code as the primary policy lever: if AI substitutes for labor rather than complementing it, the current tax system is actively subsidizing job elimination.
Where the burden falls
Derived from the proposal’s own policy documents
From the perspective of political opposition
Verbatim from podcast transcripts; each links to the moment it was said
“Right now, our tax structure actually incentivizes laying people off to invest in AI. We put huge taxes on hiring a human or keeping a human hired. We have employment taxes. We have payroll taxes. We have requirements for benefits. And we put huge discounts on using AI.”
“[Bores'] proposal takes the company seriously 'cause the companies are saying AI is gonna replace jobs, it's gonna concentrate the gains. So [Bores'] proposal is like, "So let's share them"… which is also why… these firms are trying to crush him.”
Enforcement Mechanism vs. Regulatory Scope
Prevention vs. Liability & Regulatory Authority
Innovation Priority vs. Worker Protection
Pre-deployment Obligations vs. Federal Preemption